Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06
review-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06-secdir-lc-weis-2018-06-07-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2018-06-04 | |
| Requested | 2018-05-21 | |
| Authors | Randall R. Stewart , Michael Tüxen , Maksim Proshin | |
| I-D last updated | 2018-06-07 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -06
by Brian Weis
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Brian Weis |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2018-06-07 |
review-ietf-tsvwg-rfc4960-errata-06-secdir-lc-weis-2018-06-07-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The purpose of this document is to provide a history of changes that will be made to the next version of SCTP. The changes are comprised of resolutions to errata and referencing published extensions to SCTP that should be included in the next version of SCTP. There do no appear to be any security considerations to the errata or other text included in this Internet-Draft. I consider it Ready for publication.