Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-13
review-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-13-secdir-lc-hoffman-2016-03-31-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 18) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-04-11 | |
| Requested | 2016-03-23 | |
| Authors | Paul Jones , Subha Dhesikan , Cullen Jennings , Dan Druta | |
| Draft last updated | 2016-03-31 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -15
by
Robert Sparks
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Paul E. Hoffman (diff) Opsdir Early review of -02 by Fred Baker (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Paul E. Hoffman |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-13-secdir-lc-hoffman-2016-03-31
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 18) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-03-31 |
review-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-13-secdir-lc-hoffman-2016-03-31-00
The extremely short Security Considerations section is actually fine: This specification does not add any additional security implications beyond those addressed in the following DSCP-related specifications. For security implications on use of DSCP, please refer to Section 7 of [RFC7657] and Section 6 of [RFC4594]. Please also see [I-D.ietf-rtcweb-security] as an additional reference. That is, suggesting adding a QOS value to a certain kind of packet doesn't add any security concerns beyond QOS that exists before now. --Paul Hoffman