Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15
review-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15-genart-lc-sparks-2016-03-31-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-05-02
Requested 2016-04-21
Authors Paul Jones , Subha Dhesikan , Cullen Fluffy Jennings , Dan Druta
I-D last updated 2016-03-31
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -15 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Paul E. Hoffman (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -02 by Fred Baker (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Robert Sparks
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 15 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2016-03-31
review-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15-genart-lc-sparks-2016-03-31-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 31Mar2016
IETF LC End Date: 18Apr2016
IESG Telechat date: Not yet scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Ready for publication as PS with nits

Nits/editorial comments:

These are very small editorial suggestions:

The introduction says "seldom makes things worse".
Section 5 says "This is one of the cases ... can make things worse."


There are no other cases called out, leaving the implementer to guess at 


what the other pitfalls are.






It would be better to tweak that text to be less vague. I suggest 


changing the introduction to say "there is one case this draft 


discusses. Other cases may possibly exist, but are expected to be rare" 


or similar.






The sentence "These code points are solely defaults." in the 


introduction is terse, and I suspect it won't translate well. Consider 


calling out what the consequences of that statement are more simply, 


even if it takes more words.






(Note that there is a thread between Magnus and Cullen on the tsvwg list 


that is resolving, but is not yet completely settled.)