IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-ecn-05
review-ietf-tsvwg-udp-ecn-05-secdir-lc-rose-2026-04-16-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-ecn |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2026-04-16 | |
| Requested | 2026-04-02 | |
| Authors | Martin Duke | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-05-21 (Latest revision 2026-05-04) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -05
by Joel M. Halpern
(diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Carlos Pignataro (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Kyle Rose (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Kyle Rose |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-ecn by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/CnIEwaBy0ZW9nA6POb4GDf-ZfbQ | |
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2026-04-16 |
review-ietf-tsvwg-udp-ecn-05-secdir-lc-rose-2026-04-16-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. From the perspective of the security directorate, this document is Ready: it does not describe a protocol, and really just describes a very high-level status of experimental implementations for providing userspace access to ECN signaling and capabilities. Given the ephemeral nature of its findings, this document seems to exemplify the kind of thing that belongs on the IETF wiki rather than in a published RFC.