Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp-12
review-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp-12-intdir-telechat-lou-2025-09-10-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 14) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2025-09-12 | |
| Requested | 2025-09-02 | |
| Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
| Authors | Dr. Joseph D. Touch | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-06-04 (Latest revision 2025-09-15) | |
| Completed reviews |
Artart IETF Last Call review of -10
by Martin J. Dürst
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -10 by Tim Evens (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Niclas Comstedt (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -12 by David Lou (diff) Artart Telechat review of -12 by Martin J. Dürst (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -12 by Shwetha Bhandari (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | David Lou |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/uKWjJQDWvTKOPgL25LHL8dWfvo4 | |
| Reviewed revision | 12 (document currently at 14) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2025-09-10 |
review-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp-12-intdir-telechat-lou-2025-09-10-00
Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-usr-exp Title: User Ports for Experiments Reviewer: David Lou The draft proposes to reserve two user ports for experiment usages, and create a PExID registry to differentiate shared use of these ports for concurrent experiments. It's well written. Major issues: None Minor issues: 1. This draft actually touches 2 topics, the USR-EXP and the PExID. Although they are associated with each other, the PExID could be potentially used by other experiment ports (like 1021 and 1022). But the title only covers the former. Therefore, I wonder whether it would be better to reflext PExID in the title as well. 2. P2, "EXP2 -> "EXP2" 3. P3, "that are, that are...", duplicated twice 4. P5, "network-stand byte order..." -> "networkstand byte order", to make it consistant with other apprearance 5. P6, "SCTP and DCCP connections can use self-assigned Private service codes, which provide experimental-use identification [RFC4340][RFC5595]". The 2 RFCs only covers DCCP. It would be nice to have one reference for SCTP as well. 6. P6, "...a single approach to indicating..." -> "...a single approach indicating..." Regards David