Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases-04

Request Review of draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2024-02-15
Requested 2024-02-01
Authors Edward J. Birrane , Nicolas Kuhn , Yingzhen Qu , Rick Taylor , Li Zhang
I-D last updated 2024-02-15
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Sean Turner (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -04 by Michael Scharf (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -05 by Pascal Thubert (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -07 by Charles E. Perkins (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -05 by Sean Turner (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Behcet Sarikaya
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-02-15
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases-04
Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya
Review Date: 2024-02-15
IETF LC End Date: 2024-02-15
IESG Telechat date: 2024-02-29

This document describes time-variant routing use cases in terms of resource
preservation, mainly in IoT, operating efficiency in cellular and campus
networks, dynamic reachability mainly in satellite networks. It is expected to
serve to bring updates to the routing protocols such as IGP, OSPF, etc. It is
well written, makes a good case, especially with effective use of simple
diagrams and is ready to go. However I have found a few small issues which can
be easily fixed. Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
Section 1. I think that adding a paragraph on what is covered in Section 6
would help. Section 3. .. such a through Solar Panels : I don't understand what
is meant here, is it solar LED lights?

Section 4.
clouds on an optical link : why would cloudy weather affect optical link
transmission? Section 5. it seems like the term ground station is used to mean
the user antennas. There is also gateway ground stations. Please clarify this.
The acronym IGP should be expanded. Section 6. see above my comment on Section