Last Call Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11
review-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11-opsdir-lc-brownlee-2015-03-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2015-03-03 | |
| Requested | 2015-02-05 | |
| Authors | Ole Trøan , Brian E. Carpenter | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-05-20 (Latest revision 2015-01-28) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -11
by Joel M. Halpern
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -?? by Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -11 by Nevil Brownlee Tsvdir IETF Last Call review of -?? by Dan Wing |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Nevil Brownlee |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 11 | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2015-03-11 |
review-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11-opsdir-lc-brownlee-2015-03-11-00
Hi all:
I have performed an Operations Directorate review of
draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-11
"Experience with the "Connection of IPv6 Domains via IPv4 Clouds
(6to4)" IPv6 transition mechanism defined in RFC 3056 has shown that
when used in its anycast mode, the mechanism is unsuitable for
widespread deployment and use in the Internet. This document
therefore requests that RFC 3068, "An Anycast Prefix for 6to4 Relay
Routers", be made obsolete and moved to historic status. It also
obsoletes RFC 6732 "6to4 Provider Managed Tunnels". It recommends
that future products should not support 6to4 anycast and that
existing deployments should be reviewed. This complements the
guidelines in RFC 6343."
- - - -
This is a short draft that does exactly what its abstract (above)
says. On the way it explains briefly what the 6to4 deployment problems
are, and make it clear that although 3068 should become Historical
and 6372 Obsolete, that really means "don't do this in new deployments,"
and if you have it deployed, "consider whether it's really still needed."
Overall, a good document, ready for publication.
Cheers, Nevil
Co-chair, IPFIX and EMAN WGs
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Nevil Brownlee Computer Science Department
Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x88941 The University of Auckland
FAX: +64 9 373 7453 Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand