Last Call Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01
review-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01-genart-lc-black-2015-04-21-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2015-04-20 | |
| Requested | 2015-04-06 | |
| Authors | Mohamed Boucadair , Alexandre Petrescu , Fred Baker | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-04-21 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -01
by David L. Black
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -02 by David L. Black (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Paul Wouters (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Al Morton (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | David L. Black |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 03) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2015-04-21 |
review-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01-genart-lc-black-2015-04-21-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01 Reviewer: David Black Review Date: April 20, 2015 IETF LC End Date: April 20, 2015 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. This is a short crisp draft on behavior of CIDR prefixes in IPv6 forwarding with respect to the /64 boundary in IPv6 addresses. It's clear, well explained easy to understand, plus refreshingly short. Nicely done! Major issues: (none) Minor issues: (none) Nits/editorial comments: Ok, I found a nit ... and so did idnits ;-). -- Abstract Hardware and software algorithms should therefore impose no rules on prefix length, but implement longest-match-first on prefixes of any valid length. "algorithms" isn't the right word. I suggest "implementations of routing and forwarding" idnits pointed out that: A later version (-06) exists of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-05 Thanks, --David ---------------------------------------------------- David L. Black, Distinguished Engineer EMC Corporation, 176 South St., Hopkinton, MA 01748 +1 (508) 293-7953 FAX: +1 (508) 293-7786 david.black at emc.com Mobile: +1 (978) 394-7754 ----------------------------------------------------