Last Call Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01
review-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01-secdir-lc-wouters-2015-04-23-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2015-04-20
Requested 2015-04-09
Other Reviews Genart Last Call review of -01 by David Black (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -02 by David Black (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Al Morton (diff)
Review State Completed
Reviewer Paul Wouters
Review review-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01-secdir-lc-wouters-2015-04-23
Posted at https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg05666.html
Reviewed rev. 01 (document currently at 03)
Review result Ready
Draft last updated 2015-04-23
Review completed: 2015-04-23

Review
review-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01-secdir-lc-wouters-2015-04-23

Secdir review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cidr-prefix-01

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document clarifies IPv6 forwarders should support all IPv6 prefix
lengths and use longest-match-first on prefixes of any valid length.

This document does not introduce security issues in addition to what
is discussed in [RFC4291], which it references in its Security
Considerations section.

I think this draft is Ready.

Paul