Telechat Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05
review-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05-iotdir-telechat-krishnan-2020-10-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir)
Deadline 2020-10-20
Requested 2020-10-12
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Fernando Gont, Jan Zorz, Richard Patterson, Bernie Volz
Draft last updated 2020-10-21
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Christopher Wood (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -05 by Suresh Krishnan (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -05 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Comments
I would appreciate a review on this 11-page document keeping in mind the specifics of IoT.
You may want to have the same reviewer for draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum and draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum.
Thank you,
-éric
Assignment Reviewer Suresh Krishnan 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05-iotdir-telechat-krishnan-2020-10-21
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/yLSsTnrJUgcQFbzCp70pVBoC7V4
Reviewed rev. 05 (document currently at 07)
Review result Ready with Issues
Review completed: 2020-10-21

Review
review-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05-iotdir-telechat-krishnan-2020-10-21

Minor
-------

* Section 3.1 Second Paragraph

Looks like there is a minor error in the DHCPv6 option handling. Suggest fixing this

OLD:

This means that the advertised "Preferred Lifetime" and "Valid Lifetime" MUST be dynamically adjusted

NEW:

This means that the advertised "preferred-lifetime" and "valid-lifetime" MUST be dynamically adjusted

* Section 3.3

Are there any recommendations for the T1 and T2 times for the DHCPv6 IA options? Or is the expectation that they will be set to 0.5 and 0.8 of the shortest preferred-lifetime inside the IAs?