Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05
review-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05-iotdir-telechat-krishnan-2020-10-21-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir)
Deadline 2020-10-20
Requested 2020-10-12
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Fernando Gont , Jan Zorz , Richard Patterson , Bernie Volz
I-D last updated 2020-10-21
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Christopher A. Wood (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Pete Resnick (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -05 by Suresh Krishnan (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -05 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Comments
I would appreciate a review on this 11-page document keeping in mind the specifics of IoT.
You may want to have the same reviewer for draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum and draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum.
Thank you,
-éric
Assignment Reviewer Suresh Krishnan
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum by Internet of Things Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/yLSsTnrJUgcQFbzCp70pVBoC7V4
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2020-10-21
review-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05-iotdir-telechat-krishnan-2020-10-21-00
Minor
-------

* Section 3.1 Second Paragraph

Looks like there is a minor error in the DHCPv6 option handling. Suggest fixing
this

OLD:

This means that the advertised "Preferred Lifetime" and "Valid Lifetime" MUST
be dynamically adjusted

NEW:

This means that the advertised "preferred-lifetime" and "valid-lifetime" MUST
be dynamically adjusted

* Section 3.3

Are there any recommendations for the T1 and T2 times for the DHCPv6 IA
options? Or is the expectation that they will be set to 0.5 and 0.8 of the
shortest preferred-lifetime inside the IAs?