Telechat Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05
review-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05-iotdir-telechat-krishnan-2020-10-21-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir) | |
Deadline | 2020-10-20 | |
Requested | 2020-10-12 | |
Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
Authors | Fernando Gont , Jan Zorz , Richard Patterson , Bernie Volz | |
I-D last updated | 2020-10-21 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -04
by Christopher A. Wood
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Pete Resnick (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -05 by Suresh Krishnan (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -05 by Sheng Jiang (diff) |
|
Comments |
I would appreciate a review on this 11-page document keeping in mind the specifics of IoT. You may want to have the same reviewer for draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum and draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum. Thank you, -éric |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Suresh Krishnan |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum by Internet of Things Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/yLSsTnrJUgcQFbzCp70pVBoC7V4 | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 08) | |
Result | Ready w/issues | |
Completed | 2020-10-21 |
review-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05-iotdir-telechat-krishnan-2020-10-21-00
Minor ------- * Section 3.1 Second Paragraph Looks like there is a minor error in the DHCPv6 option handling. Suggest fixing this OLD: This means that the advertised "Preferred Lifetime" and "Valid Lifetime" MUST be dynamically adjusted NEW: This means that the advertised "preferred-lifetime" and "valid-lifetime" MUST be dynamically adjusted * Section 3.3 Are there any recommendations for the T1 and T2 times for the DHCPv6 IA options? Or is the expectation that they will be set to 0.5 and 0.8 of the shortest preferred-lifetime inside the IAs?