Telechat Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06
review-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06-iotdir-telechat-velvindron-2021-04-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir)
Deadline 2021-04-20
Requested 2021-04-12
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Fernando Gont , Nick Hilliard , Gert Döring, Warren "Ace" Kumari , Geoff Huston , Will (Shucheng) LIU
I-D last updated 2021-04-19
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -05 by Gorry Fairhurst (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -06 by Loganaden Velvindron (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -06 by Timothy Winters (diff)
Comments 
While extension headers are not used in constrained networks, they are still used in some IoT networks.
Therefore, a review from those not-so-constrained IoT devices is important.
Please note that this is for the final step, i.e., the IESG telechat with a deadline of Tuesday 20th of April
Thank you in advance

-éric
Assignment Reviewer Loganaden Velvindron
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops by Internet of Things Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/YIJRsiMw1uBVBUBpvE_T_fosBu4
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready
Completed 2021-04-19
review-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-ehs-packet-drops-06-iotdir-telechat-velvindron-2021-04-19-00
I have reviewed the Internet draft as part of IOT Directorate.

Here are some of my comments. Please treat them as any other comment.

I have looked at an IOT implementation and it appears to be limiting sizes of
ipv6 extension headers and other IOT implementations appear not to support
extension headers.

I believe that this Internet Draft explains the issues around IPv6 Extension
headers extensively.