Last Call Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nd-considerations-06
review-ietf-v6ops-nd-considerations-06-secdir-lc-leiba-2024-10-23-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-nd-considerations
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2024-10-18
Requested 2024-10-04
Authors XiPeng Xiao , Eduard V , Eduard Metz , Gyan Mishra , Nick Buraglio
I-D last updated 2025-11-20 (Latest revision 2025-05-26)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Ines Robles (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Magnus Westerlund (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Barry Leiba
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-v6ops-nd-considerations by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/WQKoyJYaJk7f_9mPPgdINAmisFc
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 14)
Result Ready
Completed 2024-10-23
review-ietf-v6ops-nd-considerations-06-secdir-lc-leiba-2024-10-23-00
Thanks for this concise, useful collection/summary that will surely be a good
reference and index going forward.  It seems quite ready to go.  I have only a
small nit-level comment; please take it or leave it as you see appropriate:

— Section 3.1 —

   Since all the three causes of ND issues are addressed, MBBv6 solves
   all ND issues.

“MBBv6 solves all ND issues” seems an overly broad statement.  :-)  I know what
you mean, but I don’t think this sentence helps say it.  I suggest just
removing it, but you could try to re-word.

(Similar comment for FBBv6-P2MP at the end of 3.2.)