Last Call Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-
review-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-genart-lc-dupont-2012-06-24-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2012-06-19
Requested 2012-05-31
Draft last updated 2012-06-24
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -?? by Francis Dupont
Genart Last Call review of -?? by Francis Dupont
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Francis Dupont
Secdir Early review of -?? by Kathleen Moriarty
Assignment Reviewer Francis Dupont
State Completed
Review review-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-genart-lc-dupont-2012-06-24
Review completed: 2012-06-24

Review
review-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-genart-lc-dupont-2012-06-24

(this message was stuck by the problems of the art.tools.ietf.org box
but without too much trouble as the summary went through in time)

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-ra-guard-implementation-04.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20120606
IETF LC End Date: 20120612
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - ToC Page 2: RA Guard -> RA-Guard

 - ToC page 2: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 1 page 3: a funny fact is DHCPv4 (which IMHO is not really over IP)
 is not sensible to this attack, at the opposite of DHCPv6...

 - 2 page 4, title: RA Guard -> RA-Guard

 - 3 page 9, point 6: in fact IPsec has its own issue with fragmentation...
  Nevertheless I agree with the proposed text.

 - 6 page 13: i.e. -> i.e., and e.g. -> e.g.,

 - 7 page 14: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - B page 18: organisations -> organizations

Thanks

Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr