Last Call Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-03
review-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-03-secdir-lc-wierenga-2020-09-24-2-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2020-09-09 | |
| Requested | 2020-08-26 | |
| Authors | Fernando Gont , Jan Zorz , Richard Patterson | |
| I-D last updated | 2021-03-10 (Latest revision 2020-11-02) | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -03
by Klaas Wierenga
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -03 by Dale R. Worley (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -03 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -04 by Ted Lemon (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -04 by Sheng Jiang (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Klaas Wierenga |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/g7vIhq6uSe8_79up_gsILOXI1hg | |
| Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 05) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2020-09-24 |
review-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-03-secdir-lc-wierenga-2020-09-24-2-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The document is clear and well-written. I believe that the workarounds presented are a bit weak, but I guess the future work will address the issue in a more fundamental manner. From a security considerations point of view, I agree with the authors that the document does not introduce any new security concerns. The summary of the review is: Ready