Last Call Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-03
review-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-03-secdir-lc-wierenga-2020-09-24-2-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2020-09-09
Requested 2020-08-26
Authors Fernando Gont, Jan Zorz, Richard Patterson
Draft last updated 2020-09-24
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Klaas Wierenga (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Dale Worley (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -04 by Ted Lemon
Intdir Telechat review of -04 by Sheng Jiang
Assignment Reviewer Klaas Wierenga 
State Completed
Review review-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-03-secdir-lc-wierenga-2020-09-24-2
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/g7vIhq6uSe8_79up_gsILOXI1hg
Reviewed rev. 03 (document currently at 04)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2020-09-24

Review
review-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-03-secdir-lc-wierenga-2020-09-24-2

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The document is clear and well-written. I believe that the workarounds presented are a bit weak, but I guess the future work will address the issue in a more fundamental manner. From a security considerations point of view, I agree with the authors that the document does not introduce any new security concerns.

The summary of the review is: Ready