Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-04

Request Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2020-10-20
Requested 2020-10-12
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Fernando Gont , Jan Zorz , Richard Patterson
Draft last updated 2020-10-19
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Klaas Wierenga (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Dale R. Worley (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -04 by Ted Lemon (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -04 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
I would appreciate a review on this 13-page document.
You may want to have the same reviewer for draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum and draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum.
Thank you,
Assignment Reviewer Sheng Jiang
State Completed
Review review-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-04-intdir-telechat-jiang-2020-10-19
Posted at
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 05)
Result Ready
Completed 2020-10-19
Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
Review result: Ready


I have reviewed this document as part of the Internet Area directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the IETF drafts.

Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews
during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.


Overall Summary:

This draft is a document that intents to be an Informational  RFC. This
document document the issue scenario that IPv6 prefixes becomes invalid without
any explicit signaling and nodes still use stale addresses, and gives
recommendations to improve the network operation.

Overall this is a well written document. It is Ready for publish.