Telechat Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-04
review-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-04-intdir-telechat-jiang-2020-10-19-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
Deadline | 2020-10-20 | |
Requested | 2020-10-12 | |
Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
Authors | Fernando Gont , Jan Zorz , Richard Patterson | |
I-D last updated | 2020-10-19 | |
Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -03
by Klaas Wierenga
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Dale R. Worley (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Jürgen Schönwälder (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -04 by Ted Lemon (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -04 by Sheng Jiang (diff) |
|
Comments |
I would appreciate a review on this 13-page document. You may want to have the same reviewer for draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum and draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum. Thank you, -éric |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Sheng Jiang |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/NsLsegzrsWmThW0Fv-qS7DPC1XE | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2020-10-19 |
review-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-04-intdir-telechat-jiang-2020-10-19-00
Reviewer: Sheng Jiang Review result: Ready Hi, I have reviewed this document as part of the Internet Area directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written with the intent of improving the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum-04 Overall Summary: This draft is a document that intents to be an Informational RFC. This document document the issue scenario that IPv6 prefixes becomes invalid without any explicit signaling and nodes still use stale addresses, and gives recommendations to improve the network operation. Overall this is a well written document. It is Ready for publish. Regards, Sheng