Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-03
review-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-03-genart-lc-halpern-2017-05-25-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 13)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-06-06
Requested 2017-05-23
Authors John Jason Brzozowski , Gunter Van de Velde
I-D last updated 2017-05-25
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Intdir Last Call review of -02 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Tim Chown (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Watson Ladd (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Sarah Banks (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joel M. Halpern
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 13)
Result Ready
Completed 2017-05-25
review-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-03-genart-lc-halpern-2017-05-25-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host-??
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2017-05-25
IETF LC End Date: 2017-06-06
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This document is ready for publication as an RFC

Major issues: N/A

Minor issues:
     I will leave the decision on the appropriate status of this document to
     the IESG. I note that sections, for example the third paragraph of section
     3, are currently written as if the IETF is recommending this practice,
     rather than merely describing how to do this when it is desired.  Whether
     this is appropriate is again a call for the members of the IESG.

Nits/editorial comments: