Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-13

Request Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-04-23
Requested 2013-04-12
Authors Alan Clark , Rachel Huang , Qin Wu
I-D last updated 2013-04-19
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -10 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -13 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Matt Lepinski (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vijay K. Gurbani
State Completed
Review review-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-13-genart-telechat-gurbani-2013-04-19
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 14)
Result Ready
Completed 2013-04-19
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-burst-gap-discard-13
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Apr-19-2013
IETF LC End Date: Mar-15-2013
IESG Telechat date: Apr-25-2013

This document is ready as a Proposed Standard.  One minor comment and
one nit below.

Major: 0
Minor: 1
Nits: 1

- S2.1, the sentence, "A packet that arrives within this time window
 but is too early or late to be played out or thrown away before
 playout due to packet duplication or redundancy shall be regarded as
 discarded." is hard to read and parse.

 Clearly, if a packet arrives early, it will be buffered.  Just as
 clearly, if a packet arrives too late to be played out, it will be
 discarded.  Maybe you should break the offending sentence into two
 separate sentences, one dealing with early arrival and the other
 with late arrival.

- S1.1, last paragraph: s/in[RFC3611]./in [RFC3611]./


- vijay
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg at {,} / vijay.gurbani at