Telechat Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09
review-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09-genart-telechat-sparks-2018-05-01-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2018-05-22 | |
| Requested | 2018-04-09 | |
| Authors | Varun Singh , Rachel Huang , Roni Even , Dan Romascanu , Deng Lingli | |
| I-D last updated | 2018-05-01 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -08
by Robert Sparks
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Brian Weis (diff) Genart Telechat review of -09 by Robert Sparks (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Robert Sparks |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 10) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2018-05-01 |
review-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09-genart-telechat-sparks-2018-05-01-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcweb-rtcp-xr-metrics-09 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 2018-05-01 IETF LC End Date: 2018-02-23 IESG Telechat date: 2018-05-24 Summary: Ready for publication as an Informational RFC, but with nits to consider before publication Note that this is identical to my last call review, which I don't think I've seen a response to. The document argues to include things in the W3C statistics API in the last paragraph of 5.2.2. Section 7 seems to say those have been included already. It would be good to rework both of these mentions to reflect what's true at the time of the publication of the RFC, in a way that the text will make sense when read years from now.