Last Call Review of draft-jimenez-p2psip-coap-reload-08
review-jimenez-p2psip-coap-reload-08-genart-lc-even-2015-04-27-00
Request | Review of | draft-jimenez-p2psip-coap-reload |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2015-05-13 | |
Requested | 2015-04-16 | |
Authors | Jaime Jimenez , Jose M. Lopez-Vega , Jouni Maenpaa , Gonzalo Camarillo | |
I-D last updated | 2015-04-27 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -08
by Roni Even
(diff)
|
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Roni Even |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-jimenez-p2psip-coap-reload by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 10) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2015-04-27 |
review-jimenez-p2psip-coap-reload-08-genart-lc-even-2015-04-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-jimenez-p2psip-coap-reload-08 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2015–4-27 IETF LC End Date: 2015–5-13 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Standard Track RFC . Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: Some questions about the terminology in section 3 Client – is this different from RFC6940, if not why repeat? Router – this is a different name for a peer? I also noticed that it is used once in the document (defining constrained node) where it does not provide any value Proxy and Proxy node – Why do you need both terms. In section 7 it uses proxy(PN) like it is the same term. Constrained node the last sentence “In the latter case the node is often connected to a continuous energy power supply” it is not clear what is the latter case, also what type of node is meant. Note that there is a redundant “either a” in the previous sentence.