Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis-04

Request Review of draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2019-08-30
Requested 2019-08-02
Authors Dr. John C. Klensin , Asmus Freytag
I-D last updated 2019-08-13
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Paul Wouters (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Vijay K. Gurbani
State Completed
Review review-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis-04-genart-lc-gurbani-2019-08-13
Posted at
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 06)
Result Ready with Nits
Completed 2019-08-13
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bis-??
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: 2019-08-13
IETF LC End Date: 2019-08-30
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: This document is ready for publication as proposed standard, but has a
couple of nits as detailed below.

Major issues: 0

Minor issues: 0

Nits/editorial comments: 2

- Section 2, last paragraph: "By necessity, the latter ...", here, "latter"
 refers to "protocol restrictions".  However, I am not sure whether the rest of
 the sentence ("...the latter are somewhat generic, having to ...") refers to
 protocol restrictions or registry restrictions.  It seems to me that the rest
 of the sentence is referring to registry restrictions, in which case,

- Section 8: s/Faltstrom/Falstrom/

Thank you.