Last Call Review of draft-kucherawy-rfc8478bis-03
review-kucherawy-rfc8478bis-03-opsdir-lc-pignataro-2020-01-07-00

Request Review of draft-kucherawy-rfc8478bis
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 05)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2020-01-17
Requested 2019-12-20
Authors Yann Collet, Murray Kucherawy
Draft last updated 2020-01-07
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Daniel Migault (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Joel Halpern (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Carlos Pignataro 
State Completed
Review review-kucherawy-rfc8478bis-03-opsdir-lc-pignataro-2020-01-07
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/sZr22PCf3GDEt4jAyi3_tveG334
Reviewed rev. 03 (document currently at 05)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2020-01-07

Review
review-kucherawy-rfc8478bis-03-opsdir-lc-pignataro-2020-01-07

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Summary: Focusing primarily on the diffs from RFC 8478 and secondarily on the full document.

Nits:

Only one question: Should the Acknowledgements be augmented instead of replaced? Like "Acks for RFC 8478 are ... Further for this revision are ..."

Thanks,

Carlos.