Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-08

Request Review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 20)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-10-30
Requested 2014-10-02
Authors Michelle Cotton , Barry Leiba , Dr. Thomas Narten
I-D last updated 2014-10-23
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -08 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -11 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 20)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2014-10-23
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may



Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2014–10-23

IETF LC End Date: 2014–10-30

IESG Telechat date:

Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a BCP RFC


Major issues:

Minor issues:

Section 2.3 discusses the issue of defining appropriate registration policy. I
was wondering about consistency between the policies of similar registries, is
it important and how to verify it. For example the policy for

 is standard action and for

 is specification required. I think that such cases should be discussed when
 defining the registration policy.

Nits/editorial comments:

In section 2.3 “judgement” should be “judgment”