Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-
review-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-genart-lc-dupont-2012-02-27-00

Request Review of draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2012-03-08
Requested 2012-02-16
Authors David McGrew , Daniel Bailey
I-D last updated 2012-02-27
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -?? by Francis Dupont
Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Sam Hartman
Assignment Reviewer Francis Dupont
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Completed 2012-02-27
review-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-genart-lc-dupont-2012-02-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on 
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at 
<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments 
you may receive.

Document: draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-03.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20120224
IETF LC End Date: 20120313
IESG Telechat date: known

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None but please check my comment about 8.2

Nits/editorial comments:
 - ToC page 2 and 6.2 page 6: a 8-octet -> an 8-octet

 - ToC page 2 and 9 page 6: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 3 page 4: the wording about authentication tags is a bit strange:
  the first line uses singular and the next plural?

 - 3 page 4: the Nonce layout is not ambiguous for me but it doesn't
  use a common / easy to recognize programming language

 - 8.2 page 6: as the counter reuse is really critical I'd like to
  get a review by a cryptographer of 8.2 and 3.

Regards

Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr