Last Call Review of draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-
review-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-genart-lc-dupont-2012-02-27-00
Request | Review of | draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2012-03-08 | |
Requested | 2012-02-16 | |
Authors | David McGrew , Daniel Bailey | |
I-D last updated | 2012-02-27 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -??
by Francis Dupont
Secdir Last Call review of -?? by Sam Hartman |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Francis Dupont |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Completed | 2012-02-27 |
review-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-genart-lc-dupont-2012-02-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-mcgrew-tls-aes-ccm-03.txt Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review Date: 20120224 IETF LC End Date: 20120313 IESG Telechat date: known Summary: Ready Major issues: None Minor issues: None but please check my comment about 8.2 Nits/editorial comments: - ToC page 2 and 6.2 page 6: a 8-octet -> an 8-octet - ToC page 2 and 9 page 6: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments - 3 page 4: the wording about authentication tags is a bit strange: the first line uses singular and the next plural? - 3 page 4: the Nonce layout is not ambiguous for me but it doesn't use a common / easy to recognize programming language - 8.2 page 6: as the counter reuse is really critical I'd like to get a review by a cryptographer of 8.2 and 3. Regards Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr