Last Call Review of draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13
review-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13-rtgdir-lc-robles-2017-12-11-00
| Request | Review of | draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 25) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
| Deadline | 2017-12-04 | |
| Requested | 2017-11-06 | |
| Requested by | Alvaro Retana | |
| Authors | Kathleen Moriarty , Al Morton | |
| Draft last updated | 2017-12-11 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Telechat review of -09
by
Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -10 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Rtgdir Last Call review of -13 by Ines Robles (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -13 by Joe Clarke (diff) Genart Last Call review of -13 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -13 by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef (diff) Genart Telechat review of -15 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) |
|
| Comments |
If extra time is needed, this document will probably be on the Dec/14 Telechat, so we can extend until Dec/12. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Ines Robles |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13-rtgdir-lc-robles-2017-12-11
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 25) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2017-12-11 |
review-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13-rtgdir-lc-robles-2017-12-11-00
RtgDir review: draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13.txt Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: Effect of Pervasive Encryption on Operators - draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-13 Reviewer: Ines Robles Review Date: 12-11-2017 Intended status: Informational Summary: This document discusses current security and network management practices to help guide protocol development in support of manageable, secure networks. The draft is ready, few typos found. Comments: I believe the draft is technically good. This document is well written and clear to understand. Major Issues: No major issues found. Minor Issues: Section 2: "... Following the Snowden revelations,..." => It would be nice to add some references here Section 2.2.5: "DRM..."=> I would expand it to Digital Rights Management (DRM) Section 6: inlcudes=> includes Section 6.1: "information For example" => period missing? Section 6.2: "soltuions" -> solutions Section 7.1 title: "Encypted" => Encrypted