Last Call Review of draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
review-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01-genart-lc-taylor-2014-05-09-00
Request | Review of | draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519 |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 02) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2014-05-29 | |
Requested | 2014-05-08 | |
Authors | S Moonesamy | |
I-D last updated | 2014-05-09 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -01
by Tom Taylor
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -02 by Tom Taylor Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Dan Romascanu (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Tom Taylor |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519 by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 02) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2014-05-09 |
review-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01-genart-lc-taylor-2014-05-09-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01 Reviewer: Tom Taylor Review Date: 2014/05/08 IETF LC End Date: 2014/05/29 IESG Telechat date: (if known) Summary: This document is ready to move forward, taking for granted that the Ed25519 algorithm is fit for purpose. My knowledge of security is not sufficient to make that determination. Major issues: None. Minor issues: None. Nits/editorial comments: The very tiniest of nits: two periods rather than one following the Section 2 header number.