Last Call Review of draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
review-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01-genart-lc-taylor-2014-05-09-00

Request Review of draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 02)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-05-29
Requested 2014-05-08
Authors S Moonesamy
I-D last updated 2020-01-21 (Latest revision 2014-08-31)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -01 by Tom Taylor (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -02 by Tom Taylor
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -01 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -01 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Tom Taylor
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519 by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 01 (document currently at 02)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2014-05-09
review-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01-genart-lc-taylor-2014-05-09-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
Reviewer: Tom Taylor
Review Date:      2014/05/08
IETF LC End Date: 2014/05/29
IESG Telechat date: (if known)



Summary: This document is ready to move forward, taking for granted that 


the Ed25519 algorithm is fit for purpose. My knowledge of security is 


not sufficient to make that determination.




Major issues: None.

Minor issues: None.



Nits/editorial comments: The very tiniest of nits: two periods rather 


than one following the Section 2 header number.