Last Call Review of draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01
review-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01-opsdir-lc-romascanu-2014-06-02-00

Request Review of draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 02)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2014-05-29
Requested 2014-05-03
Authors S Moonesamy
I-D last updated 2014-06-02
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -01 by Tom Taylor (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -02 by Tom Taylor
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dan Romascanu
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519 by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 01 (document currently at 02)
Result Ready
Completed 2014-06-02
review-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01-opsdir-lc-romascanu-2014-06-02-00

This is the OPS-DIR review of

draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519

. The version that I reviewed is

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01.txt

.



The OPS-DIR reviews are focused on the operational and manageability aspects of
the documents using RFC 5706 as guidance. Please consider these comments
together with the other IETF Last Call comments.



This document  Informational RFC status. It extends the IANA "SSHFP RR Types
for public key algorithms" registry by adding an algorithm number for Ed25519.
There are no manageability or operational implications related to this
document. None of the checklist items listed in RFC 5706 apply.



A number of nits will be easily corrected by the RFC Editor:



-



[RFC6594] is not referred in the document in the bracketed format, resulting
into a ‘reference not used’ error

-



[FIPS180-4] is listed as a Normative Reference but not used

-



Ed25519 and ED25519 are inconsistently used in the document. I recommend
settling on one way to write it.



Regards,



Dan