Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-moriarty-pkcs1-03
review-moriarty-pkcs1-03-genart-telechat-yong-2016-11-12-00

Request Review of draft-moriarty-pkcs1
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-09-13
Requested 2016-09-08
Authors Kathleen Moriarty , Burt Kaliski , Jakob Jonsson , Andreas Rusch
I-D last updated 2016-11-12
Completed reviews Genart Telechat review of -03 by Lucy Yong
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Paul Wouters (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Lucy Yong
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-moriarty-pkcs1 by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 03
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2016-11-12
review-moriarty-pkcs1-03-genart-telechat-yong-2016-11-12-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>



Document:

                       draft-moriaty-pkcs1-03

Reviewer:



Lucy Yong

Review Date:



15 September 2016

IETF LC End Date:



2 September 2016



Summary:

The document is well written, and is ready for publication as Informational
RFC. IPR considerations are in Appendix D.

Major Issues:    None

Minor Issues:

·



Several places use xxx-PKCS-v1_5, should it be xxx-PKCS1-v1_5? where xxx may be
EMSA, RSAES, and RSASSA.

Editorial Issues:

·



Please check the Idnits tool

·



Page 18: s/k - 2hLen -2/k - 2hLen - 2/

·



Page 18: s/"knowing"the/"knowing" the/



·



Page 40: s/

-- such as the salt value in EMSA-PSS --/

such as the salt value in EMSA-PSS/

·



replace Section 7.2.2. title with “Decryption operation”

·



In Section 8.2, s/Note:/Note./   (to be consistent with the rest of doc.)

·



Section 8.2 last paragraph, replace “recommended” with “RECOMMENDED”

Regards,

Lucy