Telechat Review of draft-moriarty-pkcs1-03
review-moriarty-pkcs1-03-genart-telechat-yong-2016-11-12-00

Request Review of draft-moriarty-pkcs1
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-09-13
Requested 2016-09-08
Authors Kathleen Moriarty, Burt Kaliski, Jakob Jonsson, Andreas Rusch
Draft last updated 2016-11-12
Completed reviews Genart Telechat review of -03 by Lucy Yong
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Paul Wouters (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Lucy Yong
State Completed
Review review-moriarty-pkcs1-03-genart-telechat-yong-2016-11-12
Reviewed rev. 03
Review result Ready with Issues
Review completed: 2016-11-12

Review
review-moriarty-pkcs1-03-genart-telechat-yong-2016-11-12






I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>

 




Document:

                       draft-moriaty-pkcs1-03




Reviewer:

                        


Lucy Yong




Review Date:

                  


15 September 2016




IETF LC End Date:

           


2 September 2016




 




Summary:




The document is well written, and is ready for publication as Informational RFC. IPR considerations are in Appendix D.




Major Issues:    None




Minor Issues:   








·

        


Several places use xxx-PKCS-v1_5, should it be xxx-PKCS1-v1_5? where xxx may be EMSA, RSAES, and RSASSA.




Editorial Issues:










·

        


Please check the Idnits tool







·

        


Page 18: s/k - 2hLen -2/k - 2hLen - 2/







·

        


Page 18: s/"knowing"the/"knowing" the/

 







·

        


Page 40: s/




-- such as the salt value in EMSA-PSS --/




such as the salt value in EMSA-PSS/







·

        


replace Section 7.2.2. title with “Decryption operation”







·

        


In Section 8.2, s/Note:/Note./   (to be consistent with the rest of doc.)







·

        


Section 8.2 last paragraph, replace “recommended” with “RECOMMENDED”




Regards,




Lucy