Last Call Review of draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03
review-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03-opsdir-lc-wijnen-2014-01-02-00
Request | Review of | draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1 |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2014-01-10 | |
Requested | 2013-12-18 | |
Authors | Kathleen Moriarty , Magnus Nyström , Sean Parkinson, Andreas Rusch, Michael Scott | |
I-D last updated | 2014-01-02 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03
by Francis Dupont
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Tina Tsou (Ting ZOU) (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Bert Wijnen (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Bert Wijnen |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1 by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2014-01-02 |
review-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03-opsdir-lc-wijnen-2014-01-02-00
sorry, mistyped the opsdir mlist -------- Original Message -------- Subject: OPSDIR review of: draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03.txt Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:58:04 +0100 From: Bert Wijnen <bwijnen at ripe.net> To: draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1.all at tools.ietf.org CC: opsdir at ietf.org I did OPSDIR review for this document. From an operational and NM aspect, I do not see any issues. I do have some general questions/comments though. (None of them blocking though) - The documents iften says "this standard". That feels weird. It is targeted for INFORMATIONAL document and if with "this standard" it is meant to say "ietf standard", then that status is something that may change over the liftime of an RFC. I think it might be better to use "this document" or "this memo". - IN the security considerations section it syas: and relevant guidelines (e.g., SP 800-61-1) should be taken And in the change log it says: A reference was added to SP 800-132 for its recommendations... But I am missing the "citation" and the item in the REFERENCES section. I guess those active in security AREA all know where to find this, but for other readers it might be handy to have that refeneces in the list of references. Bert