Last Call Review of draft-murchison-nntp-compress-05
review-murchison-nntp-compress-05-genart-lc-dupont-2016-09-26-00

Request Review of draft-murchison-nntp-compress
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-10-10
Requested 2016-09-15
Authors Kenneth Murchison , Julien ÉLIE
I-D last updated 2016-09-26
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -05 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Francis Dupont
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Francis Dupont
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-murchison-nntp-compress by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 06)
Result Ready
Completed 2016-09-26
review-murchison-nntp-compress-05-genart-lc-dupont-2016-09-26-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-murchison-nntp-compress-05.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20160922
IETF LC End Date: 20161010
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 - ToC page 2 and A page 21: Acknowledgements -> Acknowledgments

 - 2.2.1 page 5: e.g. -> e.g.,

 - 3 page 11: e.g, -> e.g.,

 - 7.1.1 page 15: I strongly suggest to not name the algorithm X,
  i.e., Subject: Registration of NNTP compression algorithm X -> Z

 - 7.1.2 page 16: if you can do that (or ask the RFC Editor):
  insert a line break before "(<ietf-" in place than between
  this and "nntp@...".

 - Authors' Addresses: I suggest to change US into USA. BTW if you
  prefer ISO IS 3166 2 letter codes you should change France into FR

Regards

Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr

PS: about the not ASCII characters in Authors' Addresses, you can (should)
ask the RFC Editor for guidelines (I know things are changing about
this point but not what will be implemented before the publication
of this document...)