Last Call Review of draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02
review-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02-secdir-lc-eastlake-2019-12-24-00
Request | Review of | draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 03) | |
Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2019-12-16 | |
Requested | 2019-11-18 | |
Authors | Mark Nottingham | |
I-D last updated | 2020-06-30 (Latest revision 2020-01-05) | |
Completed reviews |
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -02
by Qin Wu
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -02 by Robert Sparks (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -02 by Donald E. Eastlake 3rd (diff) Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -02 by Dr. Joseph D. Touch (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Donald E. Eastlake 3rd |
State | Completed | |
Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-nottingham-rfc7320bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/miVkGG5AlRRT8AOGYVHTtop7muo | |
Reviewed revision | 02 (document currently at 03) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2019-12-14 |
review-nottingham-rfc7320bis-02-secdir-lc-eastlake-2019-12-24-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready with Nits. This draft looks fine from a security point of view. I agree with the Security Considerations that the draft prohibits some URI specification practices that could lead to security problems. However, maybe I was being dense, but I found it pretty hard to grasp the details of exactly what the draft was saying. No doubt someone who lives in the world of URIs all the time would have had an easier time. Nevertheless, I think the draft would be vastly improved by adding 10 to 20 examples showing URIs that are both good and bad rather than having only descriptive text of what were good and bad practices. At least I think that would make it much easier for me to have understood and reduced, perhaps to one, the number of times I needed to read the draft to feel that I really understood it. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e3e3@gmail.com