Last Call Review of draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05
review-nottingham-safe-hint-05-genart-lc-carpenter-2014-10-24-00
Request | Review of | draft-nottingham-safe-hint |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2014-11-18 | |
Requested | 2014-10-23 | |
Authors | Mark Nottingham | |
I-D last updated | 2014-10-24 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Brian E. Carpenter
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Brian E. Carpenter (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Matt Lepinski (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Brian E. Carpenter |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-nottingham-safe-hint by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 11) | |
Result | Almost ready | |
Completed | 2014-10-24 |
review-nottingham-safe-hint-05-genart-lc-carpenter-2014-10-24-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-nottingham-safe-hint-05.txt Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review Date: 2014-10-24 IETF LC End Date: 2014-11-18 IESG Telechat date: Summary: Almost ready -------- Comment: -------- I have no technical comments. I have not been reading the IETF Last Call thread, but my opinion fwiw is that this a figleaf that will provide no real protection. Undesirable sites will simply ignore it. "Safe" sites don't need it. Minor issues: ------------- As the writeup says: "The IANA Considerations section is a bit sparse. It should at least name the registry it's updating for convenience of the reader."