Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-03
review-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-03-genart-lc-kline-2018-11-12-00

Request Review of draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-11-13
Requested 2018-10-16
Authors Alexis Tamas , Benjamin Phister , Jean-Emmanuel Rodriguez
I-D last updated 2018-11-12
Completed reviews Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Qin Wu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Magnus Nyström (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Erik Kline (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Erik Kline
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2018-11-12
review-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-03-genart-lc-kline-2018-11-12-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-??
Reviewer: Erik Kline
Review Date: 2018-11-12
IETF LC End Date: 2018-11-13
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Seems perfectly fine to me, though (per nit below) one or two examples
might help a reader unfamiliar with Frogans (such as myself).

URI vs IRI seems consistent with my current understanding.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments: I can't help but wonder if an example or two wouldn't
round out the document.  But maybe leaptofrogans: URIs/IRIs aren't amenable to
constructing an example?