Last Call Review of draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-03
review-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-03-genart-lc-kline-2018-11-12-00
Request | Review of | draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2018-11-13 | |
Requested | 2018-10-16 | |
Authors | Alexis Tamas , Benjamin Phister , Jean-Emmanuel Rodriguez | |
I-D last updated | 2018-11-12 | |
Completed reviews |
Opsdir Last Call review of -03
by Qin Wu
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Magnus Nyström (diff) Genart Last Call review of -03 by Erik Kline (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Erik Kline |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 07) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2018-11-12 |
review-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-03-genart-lc-kline-2018-11-12-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-op3ft-leaptofrogans-uri-scheme-?? Reviewer: Erik Kline Review Date: 2018-11-12 IETF LC End Date: 2018-11-13 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: Seems perfectly fine to me, though (per nit below) one or two examples might help a reader unfamiliar with Frogans (such as myself). URI vs IRI seems consistent with my current understanding. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: I can't help but wonder if an example or two wouldn't round out the document. But maybe leaptofrogans: URIs/IRIs aren't amenable to constructing an example?