Last Call Review of draft-pti-pen-registration-08
review-pti-pen-registration-08-artart-lc-leiba-2022-11-08-00
| Request | Review of | draft-pti-pen-registration |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | ART Area Review Team (artart) | |
| Deadline | 2022-12-04 | |
| Requested | 2022-11-06 | |
| Authors | Amanda Baber , Paul E. Hoffman | |
| I-D last updated | 2023-03-01 (Latest revision 2022-12-15) | |
| Completed reviews |
Artart IETF Last Call review of -08
by Barry Leiba
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -09 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Artart IETF Last Call review of -09 by Barry Leiba (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Barry Leiba |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-pti-pen-registration by ART Area Review Team Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/40R8NfBgPputBJJMHt_geD5F8nY | |
| Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 10) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2022-11-08 |
review-pti-pen-registration-08-artart-lc-leiba-2022-11-08-00
Clear and clean, thanks. I have just the nittiest nit and one question: The nit: “Diameter” is not an acronym and shouldn’t be in ALL CAPS. (Section 1.1 and Section 3) The question: Section 2.1 says, “The contact's name and email address will be included in the public registry.” Hadn’t we decided not to post email addresses in the registries going forward, for privacy reasons? I thought that IANA would record but not post the contact details, and would make the connection upon request. But maybe I misremember or misunderstood.