Last Call Review of draft-resnick-on-consensus-06
review-resnick-on-consensus-06-genart-lc-housley-2014-07-17-00
Request | Review of | draft-resnick-on-consensus |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 07) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2013-11-19 | |
Requested | 2013-10-17 | |
Authors | Pete Resnick | |
I-D last updated | 2014-07-17 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Russ Housley
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Russ Housley (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Jeffrey Hutzelman (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Carlos Pignataro (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Russ Housley |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-resnick-on-consensus by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 07) | |
Result | Ready w/issues | |
Completed | 2014-07-17 |
review-resnick-on-consensus-06-genart-lc-housley-2014-07-17-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-resnick-on-consensus-06 Reviewer: Russ Housley Review Date: 14-November-2013 IETF LC End Date: 11-November-2013 IESG Telechat date: 21-November-2013 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. Major issues: None. Thanks for addressing my concern with Section 4 in -05. Minor issues: Section 4 says that humming should be the start of a conversation, not the end. However, it can be either. I very much disagree with the last paragraph of Section 5, and I think that the words "extreme caution" are inappropriate. Section 6 tells about some pitfalls to avoid, but the hum can still be a very valuable tool to help a chair determine if the group has reached consensus.