Last Call Review of draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01
review-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01-genart-lc-fossati-2022-02-10-00
| Request | Review of | draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 02) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2022-03-07 | |
| Requested | 2022-02-09 | |
| Requested by | Lars Eggert | |
| Authors | Brian Rosen | |
| Draft last updated | 2022-02-10 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -01
by
Magnus Nystrom
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -01 by Thomas Fossati (diff) Intdir Last Call review of -01 by Wassim Haddad (diff) Iotdir Last Call review of -01 by Ines Robles (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -01 by Dr. Bernard D. Aboba (diff) |
|
| Comments |
We're trying to maximize the reviews for documents associated with the change in the RFC Editor model. Hence the request to review these pretty short documents, even though they may not need a review from a technical perspective. |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Thomas Fossati |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01-genart-lc-fossati-2022-02-10
|
|
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/voTyowjr6sbjGvBRAyAepl4bLLg | |
| Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 02) | |
| Result | Ready with Issues | |
| Completed | 2022-02-10 |
review-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-01-genart-lc-fossati-2022-02-10-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-rosen-rfcefdp-update-2026-?? Reviewer: Thomas Fossati Review Date: 2022-02-10 IETF LC End Date: 2022-03-07 IESG Telechat date: 2022-03-10 Summary: Major issues: "[...] Accordingly, in [RFC2026] Section 2.6, the sentence "RFC publication is the direct responsibility of the RFC Editor, under the general direction of the IAB" is deleted." The referenced section should be 2.1. Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: "It no longer the responsibility of the RFC Editor" Should probably be "It is no longer [...]"?