Last Call Review of draft-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements-03
review-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements-03-secdir-lc-meadows-2018-09-06-00

Request Review of draft-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-07-30
Requested 2018-07-02
Authors Shivan Sahib
Draft last updated 2018-09-06
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -02 by Matthew Miller (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Catherine Meadows
Assignment Reviewer Catherine Meadows
State Completed
Review review-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements-03-secdir-lc-meadows-2018-09-06
Reviewed rev. 03
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2018-09-06

Review
review-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements-03-secdir-lc-meadows-2018-09-06

This is a resend of a review I sent last week, in which I gave the wrong address for the secdir.  If you’ve already seen this review you can just ignore it.

 

Cathy Meadows

 

 

From: Catherine A Meadows <catherine.meadows@nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Thursday, August 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM
To: "secdir-secretary@mit.edu" <secdir-secretary@mit.edu>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, <draft-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements.all@ietf.org>
Cc: Catherine A Meadows <catherine.meadows@nrl.navy.mil>
Subject: SecDir Review of draft-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements-03

 

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 

ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 

IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 

security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 

these comments just like any other last call comments.

 

The summary of the review is “ready.”

 

In my review of version 2 of this document I had some comments about confusing language in Sections 2.1 and 2.2.

This has now been corrected, and I consider the document ready.

 

Cathy Meadows