Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements-03
review-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements-03-secdir-lc-meadows-2018-09-06-00

Request Review of draft-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2018-07-30
Requested 2018-07-02
Authors Shivan Kaul Sahib
I-D last updated 2018-09-06
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Barry Leiba (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -02 by Matthew A. Miller (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Catherine Meadows
Assignment Reviewer Catherine Meadows
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 03
Result Ready
Completed 2018-09-06
review-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements-03-secdir-lc-meadows-2018-09-06-00
This is a resend of a review I sent last week, in which I gave the wrong
address for the secdir.  If you’ve already seen this review you can just ignore
it.

Cathy Meadows

From: Catherine A Meadows <catherine.meadows@nrl.navy.mil>
Date: Thursday, August 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM
To: "secdir-secretary@mit.edu" <secdir-secretary@mit.edu>, The IESG
<iesg@ietf.org>, <draft-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements.all@ietf.org> Cc:
Catherine A Meadows <catherine.meadows@nrl.navy.mil> Subject: SecDir Review of
draft-sahib-451-new-protocol-elements-03

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's

ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the

IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the

security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat

these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is “ready.”

In my review of version 2 of this document I had some comments about confusing
language in Sections 2.1 and 2.2.

This has now been corrected, and I consider the document ready.

Cathy Meadows