Last Call Review of draft-saintandre-urn-example-04
review-saintandre-urn-example-04-genart-lc-holmberg-2013-03-27-00
Request | Review of | draft-saintandre-urn-example |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2013-04-09 | |
Requested | 2013-03-14 | |
Authors | Peter Saint-Andre | |
I-D last updated | 2013-03-27 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Christer Holmberg
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Radia Perlman (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Christer Holmberg |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-saintandre-urn-example by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2013-03-27 |
review-saintandre-urn-example-04-genart-lc-holmberg-2013-03-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-saintandre-urn-example-04 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: 25 March 2013 IETF LC End Date: 9 April 2013 IETF Telechat Date 11 April 2013 Summary: The draft is well written, with a very minor editorial comment, and is ready for publication. Major Issues: None Minor Issues: None Editorial nits: Section 2.6 contains the word “counseled”. While not wrong, is there a reason why more common IETF language can’t be used here? E.g. “recommended against”, or something? :) Best regards, Christer