Telechat Review of draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-06
review-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-06-genart-telechat-miller-2016-09-01-00

Request Review of draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-08-30
Requested 2016-08-23
Authors Sean Leonard
I-D last updated 2016-09-01
Completed reviews Genart Telechat review of -06 by Matthew A. Miller (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Yoav Nir (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Matthew A. Miller
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9 by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready
Completed 2016-09-01
review-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-06-genart-telechat-miller-2016-09-01-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

< 

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq

 >.

Document: draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-06
Reviewer: Matthew A. Miller
Review Date: 2016-08-31
IETF LC End Date: 2016-08-17
IESG Telechat date: 2016-09-01

Summary:

This document is ready to be published as an Informational document.

I'll note that while idnits complains about "non-RFC6890-compliant
IPv4 addresses", these are actually OIDs and I believe are perfectly
valid; this nit should be ignored.

Major issues:

NONE

Minor issues:

NONE

Nits/editorial comments:

NONE



Attachment:


signature.asc




Description:

 OpenPGP digital signature