Last Call Review of draft-sheffer-running-code-04
review-sheffer-running-code-04-genart-lc-holmberg-2013-04-25-00

Request Review of draft-sheffer-running-code
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2013-05-10
Requested 2013-04-17
Authors Yaron Sheffer , Adrian Farrel
I-D last updated 2013-04-25
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -04 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Derek Atkins (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Christer Holmberg
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-sheffer-running-code by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 06)
Result Ready
Completed 2013-04-25
review-sheffer-running-code-04-genart-lc-holmberg-2013-04-25-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>



Document:                         draft-sheffer-running-code-04



Reviewer:                           Christer Holmberg



Review Date:                     23 April 2013



IETF LC End Date:             10 May 2013



IETF Telechat Date           N/A



Summary:  The draft is well written, with a minor issues/question.



Major Issues: None



Minor Issues: I think it would be good to also describe and/or reference the
test cases that were performed in order to determine the interoperability. In
some cases it may be obvious, but if an Internet-Draft specifies a large
protocol,
 with many features and options, just saying that there exist interoperability
 between two implementations doesn’t really say much.



Editorial nits: None



Best regards,



Christer