Last Call Review of draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-04
review-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-04-secdir-lc-johansson-2013-11-05-00
Request | Review of | draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2013-11-04 | |
Requested | 2013-10-10 | |
Authors | Mohamed Boucadair , Christian Jacquenet | |
I-D last updated | 2013-11-05 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Suresh Krishnan
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -05 by Suresh Krishnan (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Leif Johansson (diff) Opsdir Early review of -05 by David Kessens (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Leif Johansson |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 09) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2013-11-05 |
review-sin-sdnrg-sdn-approach-04-secdir-lc-johansson-2013-11-05-00
Folks, I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This is an informational overview of SDN providing an operational and service-provider perspective. My only comment is that the Security considerations section reads: "This document does not define any protocol nor architecture" and is otherwise blank, however there is a perfectly good section "On Security" just above it that could easily qualify as a security considerations section. My suggestion would be to rename "On Security" to "Security Considerations". Cheers Leif