Last Call Review of draft-wilde-json-seq-suffix-02
review-wilde-json-seq-suffix-02-genart-lc-yee-2016-12-10-00

Request Review of draft-wilde-json-seq-suffix
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-12-08
Requested 2016-11-11
Authors Erik Wilde
I-D last updated 2016-12-10
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -02 by Peter E. Yee (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -00 by Warren "Ace" Kumari (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -01 by Al Morton (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Peter E. Yee
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-wilde-json-seq-suffix by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 02 (document currently at 03)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2016-12-10
review-wilde-json-seq-suffix-02-genart-lc-yee-2016-12-10-00
This draft is looking better than the first two.  It's in line with the other
structured syntax suffix drafts.  The only comment I have is:

Page 4, IANA Considerations, Contact name: The description of that email
address (art@ietf.org) is “Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion”, not
"Applications and Real-Time Area Working Group".  It’s not a WG that I am aware
of.  Did you want this to use this address or might you prefer appsawg? 
APPSAWG is listed as the “ART Area General Applications Working Group”.  RFC
6839 references “Apps Area Working Group (apps-discuss@ietf.org)” in its IANA
Considerations section, so I can see how you might have gotten to what you
used, but I don't think that's correct.  Give some consideration to the right
name and email address for this item and the Author/Change controller.