Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements-01

Request Review of draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2022-10-28
Requested 2022-09-30
Authors Peter E. Yee
I-D last updated 2022-10-22
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -01 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Stefan Santesson (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -01 by Scott Rose (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stewart Bryant
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 01 (document currently at 03)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2022-10-22
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements-01
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review Date: 2022-10-22
IETF LC End Date: 2022-10-28
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: Generally a well written document that is ready to go. However, I have
a concern about whether SHOULD is strong enough in terms of explaining the
reason to deny an allocation request. Then a question of IETF policy on use if
RFC 2119 language and a possible typo. All of this is easily addressed.

Major issues:
Denials SHOULD include an explanation and, if
SB> For transparency and due diligence surely denials MUST include an

Minor issues:
SB> I am not sure that RFC2119 language is applicable to the human action it is
applied to in this text.

Nits/editorial comments:

3.  Designated Expert Pool

   Expert Review [RFC8126] registry requests are registered after a
   three-week review period on the <> mailing
   list, on the advice of one or more designated experts.  However, to
SB> list, and on…?