Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements-01
review-yee-ssh-iana-requirements-01-secdir-lc-santesson-2022-10-17-00

Request Review of draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 03)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2022-10-28
Requested 2022-09-30
Authors Peter E. Yee
I-D last updated 2022-10-17
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -01 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -01 by Stefan Santesson (diff)
Dnsdir Last Call review of -01 by Scott Rose (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stefan Santesson
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-yee-ssh-iana-requirements by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/QjNstv-IklmPC8ykaYicE4vLlUM
Reviewed revision 01 (document currently at 03)
Result Has nits
Completed 2022-10-17
review-yee-ssh-iana-requirements-01-secdir-lc-santesson-2022-10-17-00
This draft is reasonable and OK in all material aspects.

The document has no security considerations and that is well motivated for this
document.

I just have a few general comments and nits:

1)
Section 2 first paragraph. I think the sentence is missing an "is" word.
Assuming that the sentence intended to say: "... whose registration policy is
changed from IETF Review to Expert Review."

2)
I'm not convinced that it is suitable and particularly useful to include a mail
discussion as a reference to a standards document. At least in this case when
the discussion seems to be in agreement at large with the initial statement by
Sean Turner. Even though this was interesting reading for me, I think a summary
of the strongest arguments would serve the document better than a link to the
actual discussion. In fact, the initial argument by Sean seems to say most of
what is relevant.