Last Call Review of draft-ymbk-aplusp-
review-ymbk-aplusp-secdir-lc-kelly-2011-01-25-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ymbk-aplusp |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2011-02-01 | |
| Requested | 2011-01-10 | |
| Authors | Randy Bush | |
| I-D last updated | 2011-01-25 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -??
by Scott G. Kelly
Tsvdir Last Call review of -?? by Pasi Sarolahti |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Scott G. Kelly |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ymbk-aplusp by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Completed | 2011-01-25 |
review-ymbk-aplusp-secdir-lc-kelly-2011-01-25-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document describes a way to extend the IPv4 address space by reclaiming some of the TCP/UDP port bits for use as address bits. The document is well written, and the security considerations seem complete. I see no security issues with this document. --Scott