Last Call Review of draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09
review-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09-genart-lc-moriarty-2014-01-31-00
| Request | Review of | draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2014-02-18 | |
| Requested | 2014-01-23 | |
| Authors | Andrew Yourtchenko , Paul Aitken, Benoît Claise | |
| Draft last updated | 2014-01-31 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -09
by
Kathleen Moriarty
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Charlie Kaufman (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Kathleen Moriarty |
| State | Completed Snapshot | |
| Review |
review-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09-genart-lc-moriarty-2014-01-31
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 11) | |
| Result | Ready with Nits | |
| Completed | 2014-01-31 |
review-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09-genart-lc-moriarty-2014-01-31-00
Document: draft-yourtchenko-cisco-ies-09 Reviewer: Kathleen Moriarty Review Date: 1/31/14 IETF LC End Date: IESG Telechat date: (if known) 2/18/14 Summary: This draft extends RFC3954, but is specific to Cisco. There has already been discussion about this being a Cisco specific draft and involved consultation with the WG chair. For Gen-art, the document has a few editorial nits that should be resolved and other reviewers points on the Cisco specific document should be considered. Otherwise, the document is ready for publication. Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: Introduction: The third sentence is terminated with a question mark and it should be a period as it is not a question in itself. The last sentence in this paragraph correctly terminates with a question mark, but the space before it should be deleted.