Identification MIB
RFC 1414
| Document | Type |
RFC - Historic
(February 1993; No errata)
Was draft-ietf-ident-mib (ident WG)
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Marshall Rose , Michael StJohns | ||
| Last updated | 2013-03-02 | ||
| Stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
| Formats | plain text html pdf htmlized bibtex | ||
| Stream | WG state | (None) | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | RFC 1414 (Historic) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
Network Working Group M. St. Johns
Request for Comments: 1414 US Department of Defense
M. Rose
Dover Beach Consulting, Inc.
February 1993
Identification MIB
Status of this Memo
This RFC specifies an IAB standards track protocol for the Internet
community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol
Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This memo defines a MIB for use with identifying the users associated
with TCP connections. It provides functionality approximately
equivalent to that provided by the protocol defined in RFC 1413 [1].
This document is a product of the TCP Client Identity Protocol
Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
Table of Contents
1. The Network Management Framework ....................... 2
2. Identification MIB ..................................... 3
3. Definitions ............................................ 3
3.1 Conformance Groups .................................... 3
3.2 Textual Conventions ................................... 3
3.3 The Ident information Group ........................... 3
4. Security Considerations ................................ 6
5. References ............................................. 6
6. Authors' Addresses ..................................... 7
St. Johns & Rose [Page 1]
RFC 1414 Identification MIB February 1993
1. The Network Management Framework
The Internet-standard Network Management Framework consists of three
components. They are:
STD 16/RFC 1155 [2] which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for
describing and naming objects for the purpose of management. STD
16/RFC 1212 [3] defines a more concise description mechanism,
which is wholly consistent with the SMI.
STD 17/RFC 1213 [4] which defines MIB-II, the core set of managed
objects for the Internet suite of protocols.
STD 15/RFC 1157 [5] which defines the SNMP, the protocol used for
network access to managed objects.
The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of
experimentation and evaluation.
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. Within a given MIB module,
objects are defined using RFC 1212's OBJECT-TYPE macro. At a
minimum, each object has a name, a syntax, an access-level, and an
implementation-status.
The name is an object identifier, an administratively assigned name,
which specifies an object type. The object type together with an
object instance serves to uniquely identify a specific instantiation
of the object. For human convenience, we often use a textual string,
termed the object descriptor, to also refer to the object type.
The syntax of an object type defines the abstract data structure
corresponding to that object type. The ASN.1 [6] language is used
for this purpose. However, RFC 1155 purposely restricts the ASN.1
constructs which may be used. These restrictions are explicitly made
for simplicity.
The access-level of an object type defines whether it makes "protocol
sense" to read and/or write the value of an instance of the object
type. (This access-level is independent of any administrative
authorization policy.)
The implementation-status of an object type indicates whether the
object is mandatory, optional, obsolete, or deprecated.
St. Johns & Rose [Page 2]
RFC 1414 Identification MIB February 1993
2. Identification MIB
The Identification MIB defines a uniform set of objects useful for
identifying users associated with TCP connections. End-systems which
support TCP may, at their option, implement this MIB. However,
administrators should read Section 4 ("Security Considerations")
before enabling these MIB objects.
3. Definitions
RFC1414-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
OBJECT-TYPE
FROM RFC-1212
tcpConnLocalAddress, tcpConnLocalPort,
tcpConnRemAddress, tcpConnRemPort
FROM RFC1213-MIB;
ident OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { mib-2 24 }
-- conformance groups
identInfo OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ident 1 }
-- textual conventions
-- none
-- the ident information system group
--
-- implementation of this group is mandatory
identTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF IdentEntry
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"A table containing user information for TCP
connections.
Note that this table contains entries for all TCP
connections on a managed system. The
corresponding instance of tcpConnState (defined in
MIB-II) indicates the state of a particular
St. Johns & Rose [Page 3]
RFC 1414 Identification MIB February 1993
connection."
::= { identInfo 1 }
identEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX IdentEntry
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"User information about a particular TCP
connection."
INDEX { tcpConnLocalAddress, tcpConnLocalPort,
tcpConnRemAddress, tcpConnRemPort }
::= { identTable 1 }
IdentEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
identStatus INTEGER,
identOpSys OCTET STRING,
identCharset OCTET STRING,
identUserid OCTET STRING,
identMisc OCTET STRING
}
identStatus OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX INTEGER {
noError(1),
unknownError(2)
}
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates whether user information for the
associated TCP connection can be determined. A
value of `noError(1)' indicates that user
information is available. A value of
`unknownError(2)' indicates that user information
is not available."
::= { identEntry 1 }
identOpSys OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE(0..40))
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates the type of operating system in use.
In addition to identifying an operating system,
each assignment made for this purpose also
(implicitly) identifies the textual format and
St. Johns & Rose [Page 4]
RFC 1414 Identification MIB February 1993
maximum size of the corresponding identUserid and
identMisc objects.
The legal values for the `indentOpSys' strings
are those listed in the SYSTEM NAMES section of
the most recent edition of the ASSIGNED NUMBERS
RFC [8]."
::= { identEntry 2 }
identCharset OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE(0..40))
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates the repertoire of the corresponding
identUserid and identMisc objects.
The legal values for the `identCharset' strings
are those listed in the CHARACTER SET section of
the most recent edition of the ASSIGNED NUMBERS
RFC [8]."
::= { identEntry 3 }
identUserid OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..255))
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates the user's identity. Interpretation of
this object requires examination of the
corresponding value of the identOpSys and
identCharset objects."
::= { identEntry 4 }
identMisc OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..255))
ACCESS read-only
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"Indicates miscellaneous information about the
user. Interpretation of this object requires
examination of the corresponding value of the
identOpSys and identCharset objects."
::= { identEntry 5 }
END
St. Johns & Rose [Page 5]
RFC 1414 Identification MIB February 1993
4. Security Considerations
The information available through this MIB is at most as trustworthy
as the host providing it OR the organization operating the host. For
example, a PC in an open lab has few if any controls on it to prevent
a user from having an SNMP query return any identifier the user
wants. Likewise, if the host has been compromised the information
returned may be completely erroneous and misleading.
This portion of the MIB space should only be used to gain hints as to
who "owns" a particular TCP connection -- information returned should
NOT be considered authoritative for at least the reasons described
above. At best, this MIB provides some additional auditing
information with respect to TCP connections. At worse it can provide
misleading, incorrect or maliciously incorrect information.
The use of the information contained in this MIB for other than
auditing or normal network management functions is strongly
discouraged. Specifically, using information from this MIB space to
make access control decisions - either as the primary method (i.e.,
no other checks) or as an adjunct to other methods may result in a
weakening of normal system security.
This MIB provides access to information about users, entities,
objects or processes which some systems might normally consider
private. The information accessible through this MIB is a rough
analog of the CallerID services provided by some phone companies and
many of the same privacy consideration and arguments that apply to
CallerID service apply to this MIB space. If you wouldn't run a
"finger" server [7] due to privacy considerations, you might not want
to provide access to this MIB space on a general basis. Access to
this portion of the MIB tree may be controlled under the normal
methods available through SNMP agent implementations.
7. References
[1] St. Johns, M., "Identification Protocol", RFC 1413, US Department
of Defense, February 1993.
[2] Rose M., and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of
Management Information for TCP/IP-based internets", STD 16, RFC
1155, Performance Systems International, Hughes LAN Systems, May
1990.
[3] Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, Editors, "Concise MIB Definitions",
STD 16, RFC 1212, Performance Systems International, Hughes LAN
Systems, March 1991.
St. Johns & Rose [Page 6]
RFC 1414 Identification MIB February 1993
[4] McCloghrie K., and M. Rose, Editors, "Management Information Base
for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets", STD 17, RFC
1213, Performance Systems International, March 1991.
[5] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin, "Simple
Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157, SNMP Research,
Performance Systems International, Performance Systems
International, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, May 1990.
[6] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection -
Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1),
International Organization for Standardization, International
Standard 8824, December 1987.
[7] Zimmerman, D., "The Finger User Information Protocol", RFC 1288,
Center for Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science,
December 1991.
[8] Reynolds, J., and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", STD 2, RFC 1340,
USC/Information Sciences Institute, July 1992.
8. Authors' Addresses
Michael C. St. Johns
U.S. Department of Defense
DARPA/CSTO
3701 N. Fairfax Dr
Arlington, VA 22203
Phone: (703) 696-2271
EMail: stjohns@DARPA.MIL
Marshall T. Rose
Dover Beach Consulting, Inc.
420 Whisman Court
Mountain View, CA 94043-2186
Phone: (415) 968-1052
EMail: mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us
St. Johns & Rose [Page 7]