% Datatracker information for RFCs on the Legacy Stream is unfortunately often
% incorrect. Please correct the bibtex below based on the information in the
% actual RFC at https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1631.txt

@misc{rfc1631,
    series =    {Request for Comments},
    number =    1631,
    howpublished =  {RFC 1631},
    publisher = {RFC Editor},
    doi =       {10.17487/RFC1631},
    url =       {https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1631},
    author =    {Kjeld Borch Egevang and Paul Francis},
    title =     {{The IP Network Address Translator (NAT)}},
    pagetotal = 10,
    year =      1994,
    month =     may,
    abstract =  {This memo proposes another short-term solution, address reuse, that complements CIDR or even makes it unnecessary. The address reuse solution is to place Network Address Translators (NAT) at the borders of stub domains. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.},
}