% Datatracker information for RFCs on the Legacy Stream is unfortunately often
% incorrect. Please correct the bibtex below based on the information in the
% actual RFC at https://rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1675.txt

@misc{rfc1675,
    series =    {Request for Comments},
    number =    1675,
    howpublished =  {RFC 1675},
    publisher = {RFC Editor},
    doi =       {10.17487/RFC1675},
    url =       {https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1675},
    author =    {Steven M. Bellovin},
    title =     {{Security Concerns for IPng}},
    pagetotal = 4,
    year =      1994,
    month =     aug,
    abstract =  {A number of the candidates for IPng have some features that are somewhat worrisome from a security perspective. While it is not necessary that IPng be an improvement over IPv4, it is mandatory that it not make things worse. This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.},
}